Methodology

Agile or Waterfall: Which Should a Georgian Company Choose

August 22, 2026 · 6 min read

Agile or Waterfall: Which Should a Georgian Company Choose

The question "Agile or Waterfall" sounds like you have to pick between the two approaches. In reality it's a more technical choice, and it depends on one thing: how well known is what you're building.

Where Waterfall works

A predictive approach works when:

  • The final outcome is known and every change is expensive
  • There are regulatory or contractual requirements
  • The sequence of work is physically fixed

Construction is the classic example. You can't change the foundation while working on the fifth floor. Here, detailed planning isn't bureaucracy. It's a necessity.

The same applies to projects where the contract sets a fixed scope and price. On such a project, "clarifying requirements along the way" means lengthy negotiations.

Where Agile works

An adaptive approach works when:

  • You don't know exactly what the customer needs
  • Change is cheap
  • An intermediate result can be shown

Software development is the ideal example. Showing a working version in two weeks and getting feedback is cheaper than discovering six months later that you were building the wrong product.

The Georgian context

Two observations that matter in local practice.

First: Many organizations say they work in Agile, when in reality all they've implemented is daily stand-up meetings. Stand-ups alone are not Agile. Agile means that priorities genuinely change based on feedback.

Second: Most government and donor-funded projects have a fixed scope and budget. Pure Agile won't work on such a project, no matter how much you want it to. The contract determines the approach, not the other way around.

Hybrid

In practice, most projects are hybrid, and that's entirely normal.

A typical model: the overall plan and budget are predictive, while execution is iterative, i.e. staged. For example, an ERP rollout: phases and deadlines are fixed in advance, while the configuration of each module happens in sprints. PMP preparation should cover the application of predictive, agile and hybrid approaches.

Four questions for the right choice

  1. Do you know exactly what you're building? If yes, predictive. If no, adaptive.
  2. What does change cost? If expensive, predictive. If cheap, adaptive.
  3. What does the contract require? A fixed scope and price essentially rules out pure Agile.
  4. Can you show an intermediate result? If not, iteration loses its point.

If the answers are mixed, the answer is hybrid.

What matters most

Match the approach to the project conditions. Knowing several approaches helps you choose a suitable way to work.

Related course

PMP Individual-Intensive Course

14 online sessions, 5 mock exams and PMI application preparation, entirely in Georgian.

Related articles

Transnational Crime and the Supply Chain

Transnational Crime and the Supply Chain

Criminal networks don't operate outside the supply chain. They use the legitimate one. Where they get in, what this process looks like from the inside, and which signs to recognize first.

All articles